How Often Does Google Change Title Tags and Why?

John McAlpin SEO Consultant
John McAlpin
SEO Consultant & Web Developer
(Click for bio)

Published: April 7, 2025

This SEO data study was conducted to answer the simple question of how often Google changes title tags. I tracked thousands of keywords across YMYL and non-YMYL websites, commercial and informational intents, and analyzed the first 50 pages of results for each keyword to uncover patterns in Google's title tag modifications.

This SEO data study was conducted to answer the simple question of how often Google changes title tags.

It’s no secret that Google changes title tags to match search intent. So why do we bother writing them at all? Well, obviously for rankings and click-thru-rate (CTR) purposes.

We need a well-optimized title tag to provide more positive ranking signals to the algorithm. We also want to have a great sales pitch in the SERP to attract users to click on our shiny blue links.

So we do all of that optimization, just for Google to change it anyways. So how often does Google change them? And why? Does it matter if it’s high volume or low volume keywords? What about YMYL?

Thus, I set out to figure it out. I collected thousands of keywords and paired them down into the most relevant commercial and informational keywords spread across YMYL and non-YMYL websites.

I tracked the results and gathered the first 50 pages of results for each keyword and began processing that data to glean any insights I could.

Biggest Takeaway

76.04%

of title tags are changed by Google

On average, Google changes title tags 76.04% of the time. This is a huge increase from a similar study that Cyrus Shepard conducted in 2023 that stated that Google was changing results 61% of the time.

There’s a lot of ways to slice and dice this data to answer specific questions, and I wanted to answer as many questions as I had. I even gathered a few valuable questions from my wicked smart SEO teammates at LOCOMOTIVE to help get more valuable information out of this study.

So this is a long one. To help make this a better user experience, especially for my friends on mobile devices, I’ve included a handy table of contents. Enjoy!

Table of Contents

Quantitative Analysis

TThis section is meant to provide quick facts to help SEOs answer questions about change statistics of title tags in SERPs. If clients or stakeholders ever question you why the title tags you carefully crafted aren’t showing up in search results properly, you can point to these statistics to prove to them that this is extremely common.

Overall Title Modification Patterns
Statistic Count Percentage
Titles changed by Google 18,924 76.04%
Titles left unchanged 5,962 23.96%
Keyword present in original title 5,460 21.94%
Keyword present in SERP title 5,355 21.52%
Table 1: Pattern analysis of modifications in changed title tags

How Much of Each Title Was Changed?

  • On average, Google removes about 2.71 words from original title tags when displaying them in search results.
  • On average, Google retains only 35.02% of the original title content.

Keyword Modification Patterns (For Changed Titles)

Pattern Count Percentage
Keyword added (not in original, added to SERP) 192 1.01%
Keyword removed (in original, removed from SERP) 297 1.57%
Keyword kept (in both original and SERP) 3,912 20.67%
Keyword never present (in neither original nor SERP) 14,523 76.74%
Table 2: Pattern analysis of keyword modifications in changed title tags

Key Findings

  • Of the title tags change, only 1.57% of title tags had their keyword removed by Google.
  • Of the title tags change, 76.74% of title tags did not have of keywords in original title tag or changed title tags.

Analysis by Search Intent

Commercial Intent (15,382 results)

Search Intent Summary Count Percentage
Titles changed 11,685 75.97%
Keyword in original title 4,908 31.91%
Keyword in SERP title 4,816 31.31%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 168 1.44%
Keyword removed 260 2.23%
Keyword kept 3,525 30.17%
Keyword never present 7,732 66.17%
Table 3: Title tag modifications for commercial intent keywords

Key Findings

  • 75.97% of commercial intent title tags were changed by Google, aligning closely with the global average modification rate.
  • 31.91% of original titles include the target keyword, with Google preserving keywords in SERP titles at a similar rate (31.31%).
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 30.17% of the time.
  • Only 1.44% of changed titles had keywords added by Google, and only 2.23% had keywords removed.
  • Of the title tags changed, 66.17% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, suggesting Google's changes focus more on improving clarity and structure than keyword manipulation.

Informational Intent (9,504 results)

Pattern Count Percentage
Titles changed 7,239 76.17%
Keyword in original title 552 5.81%
Keyword in SERP title 539 5.67%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 24 0.33%
Keyword removed 37 0.51%
Keyword kept 387 5.35%
Keyword never present 6,791 93.81%
Table 4: Title tag modifications for informational intent keywords

Key Findings

  • 76.17% of informational intent title tags were changed by Google, virtually identical to the global average modification rate.
  • Only 5.81% of original titles include the target keyword, dramatically lower than commercial intent titles (31.91%).
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 5.35% of the time.
  • Of the title tags changed, 93.81% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, suggesting informational content relies far less on exact keyword matching than commercial content.

Analysis by YMYL Status

YMYL Content (21,030 results)

YMYL Summary Count Percentage
Titles changed 15,983 76.00%
Keyword in original title 4,380 20.83%
Keyword in SERP title 4,280 20.35%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 165 1.03%
Keyword removed 265 1.66%
Keyword kept 3,137 19.63%
Keyword never present 12,416 77.68%
Table 5: Title tag modifications for YMYL content

Key Findings

  • 76.00% of YMYL (Your Money Your Life) title tags were changed by Google, virtually identical to the global average modification rate.
  • 20.83% of original titles include the target keyword, positioning between commercial (31.91%) and informational (5.81%) content.
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it >keeps the keyword 19.63% of the time.
  • Of the title tags changed, 77.68% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, suggesting Google focuses more on clarity and accuracy than keyword optimization for sensitive YMYL content.

Non-YMYL Content (3,856 results)

Non-YMYL Summary Count Percentage
Titles changed 2,941 76.27%
Keyword in original title 1,080 28.01%
Keyword in SERP title 1,075 27.88%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 27 0.92%
Keyword removed 32 1.09%
Keyword kept 775 26.35%
Keyword never present 2,107 71.64%
Table 6: Title tag modifications for non-YMYL content

Key Findings

  • 76.27% of non-YMYL title tags were changed by Google, virtually identical to both YMYL content (76.00%) and the global average.
  • 28.01% of original titles include the target keyword, significantly higher than YMYL content (20.83%) and closer to commercial intent titles.
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 26.35% of the time.
  • Of the title tags changed, 71.64% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, a slightly lower rate than for YMYL content (77.68%), suggesting non-YMYL content is somewhat more keyword-focused.

Analysis by YMYL Industry

Health (14,224 results)

Health Summary Count Percentage
Titles changed 10,883 76.51%
Keyword in original title 3,166 22.26%
Keyword in SERP title 3,137 22.05%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 87 0.80%
Keyword removed 116 1.07%
Keyword kept 2,367 21.75%
Keyword never present 8,313 76.39%
Table 7: Title tag modifications for health-related content

Key Findings

  • 76.51% of health industry title tags were changed by Google, slightly above the global average modification rate.
  • 22.26% of original titles include the target keyword, which is very similar to the overall YMYL content average (20.83%).
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 21.75% of the time.
  • Of the title tags changed, 76.39% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, suggesting Google prioritizes accuracy and clarity over keyword optimization for health-related conten

Legal (4,349 results)

Legal Summary Count Percentage
Titles changed 3,259 74.94%
Keyword in original title 856 19.68%
Keyword in SERP title 794 18.26%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 62 1.90%
Keyword removed 124 3.80%
Keyword kept 518 15.89%
Keyword never present 2,555 78.40%
Table 8: Title tag modifications for legal content

Key Findings

  • 74.94% of legal industry title tags were changed by Google, slightly below the global average modification rate.
  • 19.68% of original titles include the target keyword, which is lower than health content (22.26%) and the overall average.
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 15.89% of the time.
  • Of the title tags changed, 78.40% did not have keywords in either the original or modified title, suggesting Google prioritizes clarity over keyword optimization for legal content even more than health content.

Finance (2,457 Results)

Pattern Count Percentage
Titles changed 1,841 74.93%
Keyword in original title 358 14.57%
Keyword in SERP title 349 14.20%
For Changed Titles:    
Keyword added 16 0.87%
Keyword removed 25 1.36%
Keyword kept 252 13.69%
Keyword never present 1,548 84.08%
Table 9: Title tag modifications for finance content

Key Findings

  • 74.93% of finance industry title tags were changed by Google, slightly below the global average modification rate.
  • Only 14.57% of original titles include the target keyword, the lowest keyword inclusion rate among all analyzed categories.
  • When Google changes titles containing the target keyword, it keeps the keyword 13.69% of the time.

Analysis by Search Volume

Change Frequency by Search Volume

Search Volume Range Total Keywords Titles Changed Change Rate
0-100 9,338 7,068 75.69%
101-1,000 4,878 3,667 75.17%
1,001-10,000 5,057 3,848 76.09%
10,001-100,000 5,276 4,074 77.22%
100,001+ 337 267 79.23%
Table 10: Title tag change rates across different search volume ranges

Key Findings: Google is slightly more likely to change titles for high-volume keywords. The change rate increases consistently with search volume, from 75.17% for lower-volume terms to 79.23% for the highest-volume keywords.

Extent of Changes by Search Volume

Search Volume Range Avg. Word Difference Avg. % Content Retained
0-100 3.81 words 62.03%
101-1,000 3.62 words 62.01%
1,001-10,000 3.65 words 61.52%
10,001-100,000 3.48 words 61.52%
100,001+ 3.81 words 59.34%
Table 11: Analysis of how extensively titles are modified across search volume ranges

Key Findings: While the average word difference remains fairly consistent across volume ranges, Google retains slightly less original content (59.34%) for the highest-volume keywords compared to low-volume terms (62.03%).

Keyword Presence by Search Volume

Search Volume Range Keyword in Original Keyword in SERP Keywords Added Keywords Removed
0-100 6.86% 6.76% 0.44% 0.58%
101-1,000 13.90% 13.39% 0.60% 1.28%
1,001-10,000 34.68% 33.99% 1.61% 2.52%
10,001-100,000 42.30% 41.76% 1.74% 2.45%
100,001+ 45.99% 44.21% 2.25% 4.49%
Table 12: Analysis of keyword inclusion patterns across search volume ranges

Key Findings:

  • Higher keyword inclusion: As search volume increases, both original titles and SERP titles are much more likely to include the target keyword.
  • More keyword manipulation: Google is more active in both adding (2.25% vs 0.44%) and removing (4.49% vs 0.58%) keywords in high-volume terms compared to low-volume terms.

Key Insights

  • High Modification Rate: Google changes over 76% of all title tags, consistent across industries and YMYL status.
  • Keyword Preservation: When Google changes titles that contain the target keyword (20.67% of changed titles), it typically preserves the keyword rather than removing it.
  • Intent Matters: Commercial intent keywords are much more likely to appear in both original and SERP titles (31% vs 5% for informational).
  • Keyword Inclusion Not Primary: Contrary to what SEO practitioners might expect, adding keywords is not Google's primary reason for changing titles (only 1% of changes).
  • Industry Differences:
    • Legal content has the highest rate of keyword removal (3.80%)
    • Finance has the highest percentage of titles where keywords never appear (84.08%)
  • YMYL Status Impact: Non-YMYL content tends to include keywords in titles more often than YMYL content (28% vs 21%), suggesting Google is less focused on exact keyword matching for sensitive topics.

Why Google Changes Title Tags

1. Brand Removal (Most Common Change - 63.0% of changed titles)

Google frequently removes brand names from title tags, particularly in health-related searches.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent
high protein foods High-protein diets: Are they safe? - Mayo Clinic High-protein diets: Are they safe? Commercial
best protein powder The 12 Best Protein Powders for Men, According to Dietitians - Men's Health The 12 Best Protein Powders for Men, According to Dietitians Commercial
best prenatal vitamin The Best Prenatal Vitamins of 2023 - Healthline The Best Prenatal Vitamins of 2023 Commercial
Table 13: Examples of brand name removal in title tags

Why: Google prioritizes the core content over the brand name, especially when space is limited, the brand doesn't add substantial value to searchers, or the query isn't specifically brand-focused.

2. Improved Readability/Clarity (30.3% of changed titles)

Google rewrites titles to make them more understandable or to better match user expectations.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent
high protein foods Protein Content of Foods | Food and Nutrition Information Center Food Sources of Protein Informational
best protein powder Top 5 Protein Powders and How to Choose What's Best For You How to Choose the Best Protein Powder for Your Goals Commercial
protein supplements A Guide to Protein Supplement Uses and Benefits Should You Take Protein Supplements? Informational
Table 14: Examples of title tag modifications for improved readability

Why: Converting statements to questions (which may generate higher CTR), making the value proposition clearer, and using more direct language that aligns with how users think about topics.

3. Length Management (8.3% of changed titles)

Google truncates overly long titles or expands very short ones.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent
dog bite attorney Bitten By A Dog In Florida? - Wesley Chapel Dog Bite Lawyer - Dog Bite Lawyer Wesley Chapel - Dog Bite Lawyer Pasco County - Auto Accident Attorney Pasco County - Dog Bite Lawyer Sun City Center - Dog Bite Lawyer Ruskin - Dog Bite Lawyer Zephyrhills - Dog Bite Lawyer Dade City - Dog Bite Lawyer Land O'Lakes - Dog Bite Lawyer Florida - Dog Bite Lawyer San Antonio - Dog Bite Lawyer Lütz - Wesley Chapel Dog Bite Lawyer - Sun City Center Dog Bite Lawyer – Sarasota Dog Bite Lawyer - Ruskin Dog Bite Lawyer - Zephyrhills Dog Bite Lawyer - Dade City Dog Bite Lawyer - Land O'Lakes Dog Bite Lawyer - San Antonio Dog Bite Lawyer - Lutz Dog Bite Lawyer - Lütz Dog Bite Lawyer – TAMPA Dog Bite Lawyer - Apollo Beach Dog Bite Lawyer - Dog Bite Lawyer Lutz - Dog Bite Lawyer New Tampa - Dog Bite Lawyer TAMPA - Dog Bite Lawyer Sarasota - Dog Bite Lawyer Hillsborough County - Dog Bite Lawyer Pasco County - Dog Bite Lawyer Apollo Beach - Dog Bite Lawyer Brandon - Dog Bite Lawyer Tampa Palms - Dog Bite Lawyer Rhineland-Palatinate - Dog Bite Lawyer Odessa Oblast - Dog Bite Lawyer San Antonio FL - Dog Bite Lawyer Thonotosassa - Dog Bite Lawyer Riverview - Dog Bite Lawyer 33544 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33602 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33548 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33571 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33572 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33548 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33525 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33541 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33542 - Dog Bite Lawyer 34242 - Dog Bite Lawyer 33602 - Dog Bite Lawyer 34240 Dog Bites - Auto Accident Attorney Pasco County Commercial
plant protein sources Plant Protein - The Nutrition Source - Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Plant Protein - The Nutrition Source Informational
best protein powder for muscle gain The 10 Best Protein Powders for Building Muscle in 2023, According to Registered Dietitians The 10 Best Protein Powders for Building Muscle Commercial
Table 15: Examples of title tag length modifications

Why: Display limitations in search results, addressing very short titles that often lack sufficient information, and reformatting social media platform titles that provide no content value.

4. Search Intent Alignment

Google modifies titles to better match the user's search intent, particularly for commercial queries.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent
protein powder comparison Selecting and Effectively Using Protein Supplements Best Protein Supplements: Comparing Popular Brands Commercial
how much protein per day Dietary Reference Intakes for Macronutrients How Much Protein Do You Need Every Day? Informational
vegan protein sources Plant-Based Nutrition Guide Complete Vegan Protein Sources: A Comprehensive List Informational
Table 16: Examples of title tag modifications for search intent alignment

Why: Emphasizing commercial elements for commercial queries, removing unnecessary elements that don't serve the primary intent, and adding qualifying terms that match user expectations.

5. YMYL (Your Money, Your Life) Considerations

The data shows that 77.7% of YMYL content had title modifications, suggesting Google is particularly careful with health, finance, and other high-stakes topics.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent Change Pattern
high protein foods High-protein diets: Are they safe? - Mayo Clinic High-protein diets: Are they safe? Commercial Brand Removed
best prenatal vitamin The Best Prenatal Vitamins of 2023 - Healthline The Best Prenatal Vitamins of 2023 Commercial Brand Removed
spinal cord injury lawyer Atlanta Spinal Cord Injury Lawyers - Spinal Injury Claims Atlanta Spinal Cord Injury Lawyers Commercial Simplified
tax relief services Offer in compromise | Internal Revenue Service Offer in compromise Commercial Brand Removed
best protein powder Top 5 Protein Powders and How to Choose What's Best For You How to Choose the Best Protein Powder for Your Goals Commercial Improved Clarity
signs of vitamin d deficiency Vitamin D Deficiency: 9 Symptoms & Signs, 3 Causes, 4 Treatments 9 Signs and Symptoms of Vitamin D Deficiency Informational Simplified
debt consolidation loans Best Debt Consolidation Loans of April 2025 - Forbes Advisor Best Debt Consolidation Loans of April 2025 Commercial Brand Removed
auto loan calculator Auto Loan Calculator: Estimate Your Car Payment - NerdWallet Auto Loan Calculator: Estimate Your Car Payment Commercial Brand Removed
types of investment accounts Guide to Different Types of Investment Accounts | Fidelity Guide to Different Types of Investment Accounts Informational Brand Removed
medical malpractice attorney Medical Malpractice Attorney - Experienced Lawyers for Your Case Medical Malpractice Attorney Commercial Simplified
Why:

These examples illustrate common patterns in how Google modifies YMYL titles. However, none of the changes in my data seemed to be related to content accuracy or anything that could be potentially harmful to users. Some of main reasons titles were changed included:

  • Brand names are frequently removed (especially for high-authority sites)
  • Long, complex titles are simplified
  • Intent-focused language is often preserved or enhanced
  • Unnecessary descriptive elements are removed
  • Title structure is standardized (particularly for commercial/transactional queries)

6. Adding Specificity to Generic Titles

When websites use overly generic titles that don't adequately describe the page content or fail to include relevant keywords, Google often steps in to add specificity. This pattern is particularly common with placeholder titles, product pages with minimal information, or content that doesn't clearly communicate its purpose. In these cases, Google's modifications typically enhance the title's relevance to the search query and add valuable descriptive elements.

Examples:

Keyword Original Title SERP Title Intent
organic protein powder Our Products Organic Protein Powder - Plant-Based Formula Commercial
meal replacement protein shake Nutrition Solutions Complete Meal Replacement Protein Shakes Commercial
protein foods list Nutrition Information Complete List of High-Protein Foods by Category Informational
Table 17: Examples of adding specificity to generic title tags
Why:

Google adds specificity to generic titles primarily to improve user experience and search relevance. When a title is too vague or uninformative, it fails to help users determine whether the page contains the information they're seeking. By enhancing these titles with more descriptive elements, Google creates several benefits:

  • Improved click-through rates: More specific titles that align with search intent are more likely to attract clicks from users who find them relevant to their query.
  • Better user expectations: Enhanced titles set appropriate expectations about what users will find on the page, reducing bounce rates when the content matches the augmented title.
  • Query alignment: By adding keywords and descriptive elements that match the search query, Google helps users quickly identify relevant results.
  • Content clarification: Generic labels like "Our Products" or "Nutrition Information" don't communicate the specific focus of the page, which Google remedies by highlighting the actual content.
  • Competitive positioning: In highly competitive SERPs, generic titles would be at a significant disadvantage against more descriptive competitor titles.

Why Google Keeps Some Title Tags Unchanged

Based on analysis of the 5,962 title tags (24% of the dataset) that Google did not change, several key patterns have been identified that distinguish these titles from the ones Google modifies.

1. Optimal Length and Structure

Characteristic Unchanged Titles Changed Titles Difference
Average Character Length 44.47 characters 62.58 characters 18.11 fewer characters
Average Word Count 7.39 words 10.40 words 3.01 fewer words
Table 18: Comparison of length characteristics between changed and unchanged titles

Key Findings: Google leaves shorter, more concise titles intact. A striking 84.87% of unchanged titles fall within the 30-60 character range, which is considered optimal for SERP display.

2. Format Patterns

Format Percentage in Unchanged Titles
List format (e.g., "10 Best...") 4.18%
How-to format 5.67%
Question format 10.11%
Year in title 10.32%
Table 20: Analysis of title format patterns in unchanged titles

Key Findings: Titles with list formats (like "The 8 Best...") and how-to formats are highly represented in unchanged titles.

3. Common Title Beginnings

The most frequent title beginnings that Google leaves unchanged:

  • "how to choose" (48 occurrences)
  • "the 8 best" (39 occurrences)
  • "what are the" (38 occurrences)
  • "what is the" (38 occurrences)
  • "the 6 best" (37 occurrences)

Key Findings: Google consistently preserves titles that begin with clear intent signals like "how to," "what is," or list-format intros.

Key Takeaways: What Makes Google Leave Titles Unchanged

This analysis reveals that Google preserves titles that are already optimized for user experience, search intent, and readability—suggesting that the best way to keep your titles intact is to write them the way Google would.

  • Optimal Length: Titles between 30-60 characters (5-10 words) are most likely to remain unchanged.
  • Clean Structure: Google preserves titles without brand names or with clear, simple structures.
  • Clear Intent Signals: Titles with clear search intent patterns like "how to," "what is," and list formats (e.g., "The 10 Best") are frequently preserved.
  • Concise Keyword Usage: When keywords are naturally integrated into concise titles, Google is more likely to keep them unchanged.
  • Lack of Unnecessary Elements: Unchanged titles typically lack parentheses, brackets, or excessive punctuation.
  • Balanced Brand Placement: When brands are included, having them at either the beginning or end (not middle) seems optimal.
  • Fresh Formats: The inclusion of years (10.32% of unchanged titles) suggests Google favors titles that appear current and up-to-date.